From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sat Feb 24 17:45:09 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 25 Feb 2001 01:45:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 38484 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 01:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 25 Feb 2001 01:45:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.195) by mta2 with SMTP; 25 Feb 2001 01:45:08 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 15:53:22 -0800 Received: from 200.41.210.7 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:53:22 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.7] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Emotional expression. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 23:53:22 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2001 23:53:22.0793 (UTC) FILETIME=[F8950590:01C09EBC] From: "Jorge Llambias" Robin Lee Powell: > > >{ju'o zei o'o zei cinmo} > >{ju'o zei o'o cinmo} > >Presumably, but neither work. The ju'o binds to the word immediatly >before it; I don't think that's fixable. That is true when used as an attitudinal. When it's part of a lujvo it can't bind to the preceding word, so they do work. I'm not sure what the place structures would be though. I suppose the first one inherits the structure from cinmo with the x2 place filled by the attitudinals: ju'o zei o'o zei cinmo: x1 feels certainty/patience about x2. But what's the place structure of {ju'o zei o'o}? Is it: x1 is an attitude/feeling of certainty and patience. co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.