Subject: Re: [lojban] le pamoi nu la brojbogirz. penmi

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 23:24:23

la avital oliver cusku di'e

>Please reply with comments. Thank you.
>
>pu nu'i re lo djedi mi penmi loi pendo

I would have said: {za lo djedi be li re mi pu penmi loi pendo}.

I know that the book proposes the use of termsets for this,
but I find it too confusing, I'm not even sure of the grammar
of termsets, so I can't tell if your sentence is correct.

Also {re lo djedi} is not strictly a period of two days duration,
but two separate periods of one day. It would mean that you met
on two occasions.

>.i le girzu fi ze lo prenu .e re lo prenu ba jorne le
>gy.

{le gy} is incorrect, it should be just {gy}.

Also, you have {ze lo prenu e re lo prenu} filling
the x3 place of {jorne}.

You want something like {le girzu cu zemei ije re prenu
ba jorne gy}

>.i puki mi tavla fi le citri nu la lojban.

le citri be la lojban

>.e ba fe mi'a nunsnu fi

{ije} instead of {e}, which is only for joining sumti.

>le se smadi nu la sapir,uorf. ku

{le se smadi be la sapir,uorf}, {ku} not needed.

>je loi mupli be le nu la lojban.
>xamgu mau le glibau

{e} instead of {je}.

{la lojban xamgu mau le glibau} means "Lojban is good
with English as more". You mean something like {la lojban
cu xagmau le glibau}.

co'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.