From phma@oltronics.net Sun Feb 25 17:39:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 26 Feb 2001 01:39:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 19755 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2001 01:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Feb 2001 01:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.50) by mta2 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2001 01:39:43 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6A3373C562; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:39:20 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] nilbroda Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:37:17 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010221150126.00b6d280@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20010216215932.00af0130@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20010222185345.00b9a4e0@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010222185345.00b9a4e0@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01022520392005.19379@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat It's still not clear to me. For a non-variadic nilbroda, what is the convention? Should I go by the reference grammar, which puts ni2 at the end, or the dictionary, which puts it second? phma