From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Mar 02 17:12:46 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@erika.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 3 Mar 2001 01:12:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 38809 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 01:12:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2001 01:12:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 01:12:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f231CiV29828 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:12:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:12:43 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Meaningless talk In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > > la pycyn cusku di'e > > >As far as I can figure, one of the topic of discussion was whether > >langauage > >is langue or parole, the system of rules and items or the actual occasions > >of > >use. The usual answer is that it is parole primarily and langue is just a > >theory about that. > > Well, I would say it's a great success that you can figure out > that much! Probably neither xod nor me would have used the > words langue and parole, but that is certainly part of what > we discussed. Who's being more opaque? I've never even heard of the two terms "langue" or "parole". ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!