From pycyn@aol.com Fri Mar 02 17:52:52 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 3 Mar 2001 01:52:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 61836 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 01:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2001 01:52:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m02.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.5) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 02:53:56 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id r.b2.11fcae13 (18255) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:52:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:52:46 EST Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Meaningless talk To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_b2.11fcae13.27d1a86e_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10501 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_b2.11fcae13.27d1a86e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/2/2001 7:15:01 PM Central Standard Time, xod@sixgirls.org writes: > Who's being more opaque? I've never even heard of the two terms "langue" > or "parole". > Pedantic, maybe, but not opaque. These are standard terms in linguistics for the contrast. If you want to get into these particular games at this level, it is a good idea to read up on what's gone on in the last 150 years or so. --part1_b2.11fcae13.27d1a86e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/2/2001 7:15:01 PM Central Standard Time,
xod@sixgirls.org writes:


Who's being more opaque? I've never even heard of the two terms "langue"
or "parole".


Pedantic, maybe, but not opaque.  These are standard terms in linguistics for
the contrast.  If you want to get into these particular games at this level,
it is a good idea to read up on what's gone on in the last 150 years or so. --part1_b2.11fcae13.27d1a86e_boundary--