From phma@oltronics.net Fri Mar 02 18:02:36 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 3 Mar 2001 02:02:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 15817 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 02:02:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2001 02:02:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (207.15.133.41) by mta1 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 02:02:34 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id BD6163C56B; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:02:29 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Meaningless talk Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:59:07 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0103022102280I.22570@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat ><{cipnxirundi} is a fu'ivla, although it should have been >{cipnrxirundi} to be a regular one. I meant "swallow". >{lo cipnrxirundi pamei} = "a single swallow".> > >Sorry, I took it for "the first robin," another cliche. I am inclined to >think that fu'ivla are part of the Lojban world we don't need yet and mostly >can't handle (ta DA!) . And why not {xirundo} ala Linnaeus (I admit I had to >look it up)? It couldn't be {xirundo} as that means the meaningless word {rundo} is a subscript. And what kind of Robin were you thinking of? phma