From xod@sixgirls.org Fri Mar 02 18:10:42 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@erika.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 3 Mar 2001 02:10:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 41768 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 02:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 3 Mar 2001 02:10:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO erika.sixgirls.org) (209.208.150.50) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 03:11:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by erika.sixgirls.org (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f232Aeu00178 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:10:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:10:40 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Meaningless talk In-Reply-To: <6.12d8b16a.27d1a780@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 3/2/2001 7:15:01 PM Central Standard Time, > xod@sixgirls.org writes: > > > > Who's being more opaque? I've never even heard of the two terms "langue" > > or "parole". > > > > Pedantic, maybe, but not opaque. These are standard terms in linguistics for > the contrast. If you want to get into these particular games at this level, > it is a good idea to read up on what's gone on in the last 150 years or so. i ku'i ko na pacna le za'i mi na ciska je pensi ca le pu'u mi tcidu .i mi ca'o tcidu ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!