From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Mar 02 20:48:29 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 3 Mar 2001 04:48:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 89997 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2001 04:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 3 Mar 2001 04:48:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.216) by mta3 with SMTP; 3 Mar 2001 05:49:33 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:48:29 -0800 Received: from 200.41.210.20 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2001 04:48:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.20] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] rut pamo'o Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 04:48:28 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2001 04:48:29.0064 (UTC) FILETIME=[30D21080:01C0A39D] From: "Jorge Llambias" > >>lei re bersa se cmene zo maxLON .e zo kiLION > > > >>poi se cmene zo .orpat .e zo > >>rut > >They cannot both be {fa'u}, as that would state that Orpah married Machlon, >which she didn't. Why? I hope you are not saying that one {fa'u} somehow links with the other {fa'u} several sentences later. It's effect is only within each sentence. > >I don't understand {sa'urmi'e}. Did you mean {sa'irmi'e}? > >I meant "insist", which is {sa'urmi'e} in the jvoste. Is there a better >word? There must be! What has {sarcu} got to do with it? How about {za'orcpe}? co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.