From graywyvern@hotmail.com Thu Mar 08 12:27:29 2001
Return-Path: <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 8 Mar 2001 20:27:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 31146 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2001 20:27:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 8 Mar 2001 20:27:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.237.209) by mta3 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2001 21:28:31 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:27:27 -0800
Received: from 209.176.48.44 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Thu, 08 Mar 2001 20:27:26 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [209.176.48.44]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: [humanmarkup] Introducing the Logical Language Group
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 20:27:26 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F2094UV6rJ8ed7IgAjc0000a7f5@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2001 20:27:27.0219 (UTC) FILETIME=[310B0C30:01C0A80E]
From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>

>From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
li'o
>Naturally I am not
>proposing that HumanML be done directly in Lojban!
>

why not--first of all, how do we say "human markup" in lojban?
i confess i'm not familiar with the jargon that's taken from...
then, what's "XML"?

li'o
> > Each paradigm in psychology and spirituality has a different way of
> > describing human characteristics--

so why reify any particular notation, even lojban's, when there's
no useful consensus?


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


