From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Fri Mar 09 14:39:33 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 9 Mar 2001 22:39:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 62508 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2001 22:39:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 9 Mar 2001 22:39:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cj.egroups.com) (10.1.2.82) by mta1 with SMTP; 9 Mar 2001 22:39:32 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.10.122] by cj.egroups.com with NNFMP; 09 Mar 2001 22:39:31 -0000
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 22:39:31 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: jbotenguar.
Message-ID: <98bm33+oi7i@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Length: 652
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

I'm working on adapting some Tengwar fonts for the Lojban language
and started a test page for this task on

http://www.fa-kuan.muc.de/LOJBAN.RXML

It's partly in gif-graphic in order to give an impression of how it
looks like. To view the text of Pierre's "rut pamo'o" you'd need=20
my font (which I can e-mail on demand).
I'd like to hear your proposal on how to do the key-mappings to get a
common standard. Up to now, I was using the German keybord,=20
i.e. using the =E4, =FC, =F6 etc. keys to place the "wide" tehtar
for a, u, o etc. respectively. Did you gather any experience dealing
with this=20
issue? Your advice is highly appreciated.

.aulun.



