From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Tue Mar 13 12:44:44 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 13 Mar 2001 20:44:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 9018 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2001 20:44:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2001 20:44:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta3 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2001 21:45:46 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id PAA27749 for lojban@onelist.com; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:51:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:51:14 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: [: Re: [lojban] Parsing lujvo] Message-ID: <20010313155114.M12066@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@onelist.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:38:10PM -0000, seidensticker@msn.com wrote: > I'm having a problem parsing lujvo. Here's an example that will > illustrate the issue. Take the lujvo "boltipkeipre." The "kei" is a > rafsi for both "kei" (terminator) and "kelci" (play). The lujvo > should work out to ball+kick+play+person (presumably 'ball player' > or 'soccer player'), but my program happens upon the wrong > interpretation of kei. > > My question is: what's the rule to disambiguate kei in this case? The rafsi for kei is kez. There is no ambiguity. -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP