From seidensticker@msn.com Tue Mar 13 12:50:41 2001
Return-Path: <seidensticker@msn.com>
X-Sender: seidensticker@msn.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 13 Mar 2001 20:50:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 40585 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2001 20:50:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 13 Mar 2001 20:50:41 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fg.egroups.com) (10.1.2.134) by mta1 with SMTP; 13 Mar 2001 20:50:41 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: seidensticker@msn.com
Received: from [10.1.10.100] by fg.egroups.com with NNFMP; 13 Mar 2001 20:50:41 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:50:38 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [: Re: [lojban] Parsing lujvo]
Message-ID: <98m16u+fu40@eGroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010313155114.M12066@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 150
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 206.129.86.130
From: seidensticker@msn.com

> > My question is: what's the rule to disambiguate kei in this 
case? 
> 
> The rafsi for kei is kez. There is no ambiguity.

My mistake. Thanks.