From xod@sixgirls.org Wed Mar 14 17:56:53 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@shiva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 15 Mar 2001 01:56:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 62103 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2001 01:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 15 Mar 2001 01:56:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO shiva.sixgirls.org) (206.252.141.232) by mta3 with SMTP; 15 Mar 2001 02:57:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by shiva.sixgirls.org (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2F1XAs15157 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:33:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:33:10 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Wed, 14 Mar 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > I think the original proposal (the missing 4) was with {ca'a}, which is > clearer (and the two placements of {na'i} are less problematically > equivalent). I think I still prefer the predicative solution as a general > piece, however. pu ki mi pu'o je ca'anai snada tu'a le trene Very nice. I like this the best of all. Now the ca'a has the implicit pu in it, leaving open that you caught the next train. ----- We do not like And if a cat those Rs and Ds, needed a hat? Who can't resist Free enterprise more subsidies. is there for that!