From jjllambias@hotmail.com Thu Mar 15 18:59:06 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 16 Mar 2001 02:59:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 93890 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2001 02:58:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Mar 2001 02:58:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.240.75) by mta1 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 02:58:54 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 18:40:19 -0800
Received: from 200.41.210.7 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Fri, 16 Mar 2001 02:40:19 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.7]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Some questions
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 02:40:19 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F250ekp8tg1zSarY6FD0000141b@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2001 02:40:19.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[70BE8A50:01C0ADC2]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la avital cusku di'e

>a) Regarding be/bei/be'o. I don't quite understand why bei is needed. Why
>can't it be defined that <le SELBRI be TEXT be'o> be understood as "what
>fills the place for '_______ cu SELBRI TEXT'", and sumti are separated the
>'standard' way in a normal bridi

That would make {be'o} never elidable. With the current grammar
it usually is elidable.

>b) After starting to teach Lojban to some friends, they all shouted out
>that "This goddamn 'y' letter is all fucked-up.

My feelings precisely.

>Anyone have any explanations?

Speakers of 5-vowel languages were not consulted at the time...

>c) The use of pe with tense modifiers. I do not understand the grammer
>behind <le prenu pe pu>. This seems idiotic, or at least 'forcing the
>meaning' into the phrase. Isn't a sumti supposed to some after pe? And if
>not, what is the exact way of understanding the meaning?

Do you mean {le prenu pe pu ku}? {puku} is a term, it can be
attached to a sumti using {pe} like any other term. It would mean
"the person associated with the past (of something, usually the
past of now)".

co'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


