From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Mar 15 20:52:47 2001
Return-Path: <xod@shiva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@shiva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 16 Mar 2001 04:52:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 73794 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2001 04:52:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 16 Mar 2001 04:52:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO shiva.sixgirls.org) (206.252.141.232) by mta3 with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 05:53:51 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by shiva.sixgirls.org (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2G4THn18880 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:29:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:29:17 -0500 (EST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc
In-Reply-To: <20010315023042.G27942@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103152308110.18647-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:45:38AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > > > We really need a lujvo that means something like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > x1 just barely/scarcely/hardly/minimally is/does x2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Seconded.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Um...so does this lujvo mean x2 was done, or not?
> > >
> > > Yes, barely.
> >
> >
> > .i ja'o xu le du'u ko'a broda kei dunli le du'u ko'a pu'onai je
> > ca'a broda
>
> go'i .ije pe'i la'e di'u jetnu ni'i le du'u le bridi se cusku cu dunli
> be le cusku be le du'u le bridi ca'a fasnu ja jetnu


.i ku'i frica fi lu pu'onai li'u


> .i ku'i le lojbo
> cukta cu cusku le du'u le na vasru be le cmavo be zo ca'a be'o be'o
> bridi na dunli le vasru be zo ca'a be'o bridi

mi na mulno jimpe le do selsku .i cumki fa le du'u do skudji di'e .i ko'a
goi le cmavo be zo ca'a .i le bridi be secau ko'a cu na dunli le bridi
be pa'u ko'a


> How the hell _DO_ you talk about the selma'o in lojban text, anyways?
> 'CAhA' is, of course, not a valid lojban word.


le do pu tadji cu banzu .i le selma'o poi do pu djica cu selcmene zo ca'a




-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!


