From jjllambias@hotmail.com Sun Mar 18 10:25:01 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 18 Mar 2001 18:25:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 80097 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2001 18:25:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Mar 2001 18:25:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.44) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Mar 2001 18:24:59 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:09:01 -0800 Received: from 200.41.210.18 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:09:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.18] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: New Translation Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:09:01 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2001 22:09:01.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[B4D43570:01C0AE65] From: "Jorge Llambias" la camgusmis cusku di'e > > la sol purjbeja'e bavmro > >Didn't think of la sol, actually. Although I think I prefer: > >la sol purjberi'a bavmro I suppose it depends on how you think the lujvo is interpreted. I would interpret {purjbeja'e} as {jalge be le nu purjbe} and {purjberi'a} as {rinka be le nu purjbe}. You seem to interpret them as {nu purjbe kei je jalge} and {nu purjbe kei je rinka}. I usually try the {be} interpretation before the {je} one. In this case they give somewhat opposite meanings. > > mi kufra le po'o ctino > >Changed that since then, actually: > >semu'i mi ctino kufra semu'ibo mi ctino se kufra But that's two syllables too many, so maybe just: semu'ibo ctino kufra > > i mu'inai do darno mi > >Umm, I don't know. 8) The .i is fixable: > >.oi mu'inai do darno mi Actually, I forgot {bo} is necessary after {mu'inai}, so it should be: mu'inaibo do darno mi co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.