From xod@sixgirls.org Sun Mar 18 20:25:20 2001
Return-Path: <xod@shiva.sixgirls.org>
X-Sender: xod@shiva.sixgirls.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 19 Mar 2001 04:25:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 91738 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 04:25:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Mar 2001 04:25:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO shiva.sixgirls.org) (206.252.141.232) by mta2 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 04:25:19 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by shiva.sixgirls.org (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2J42Iu10191 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:02:18 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:02:18 -0500 (EST)
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Knowledge (was: Random lojban questions/annoyances
In-Reply-To: <F66kidcDjoYAPNXRPmc00003a9a@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103182258350.9598-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote:

>
>
> la xod cusku di'e
>
> > > Why strange?
> >
> >Because I can't objectively report on Steve's knowledge without adding my
> >own interpretation into it.
>
> You can report on his knowledge, but you wouldn't call "knowledge"
> his mistaken beliefs, even if he does call it knowledge. Just as
> you don't call them truths even though he does call them truths.
>
> >That makes the meaning of my use of
> >"knowledge" reflect the sum of my opinions + Steve's opinions. Shouldn't I
> >be able to say "Steve djuno you are a Koala Bear", even if we know (feel)
> >he's wrong?
>
> So you want {djuno} to be synonimous with {jinvi} or with {birti}?
> Why have the word at all?


birti seems like malglico, subsumable under jinvi. But why bother djuno,
since it is only a superposition of krici + tugni?



> >Is there any other Lojban word that automatically inserts the judgements
> >of every narrator?
>
> Every single Lojban word automatically inserts the judgments of
> the narrator. Which word doesn't?


krici doesn't. It reports on the objective facts. So does tugni. But djuno
sneaks the narrator's biases in there quietly.



-----
We do not like And if a cat
those Rs and Ds, needed a hat?
Who can't resist Free enterprise
more subsidies. is there for that!


