From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Sun Mar 18 20:34:06 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 19 Mar 2001 04:34:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 17536 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 04:34:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Mar 2001 04:34:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta2 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 04:34:02 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id XAA20594 for lojban@onelist.com; Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:40:51 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 23:40:50 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Knowledge (was: Random lojban questions/annoyances.)
Message-ID: <20010318234050.H3953@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@onelist.com
References: <20010318231852.E3953@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103182249460.9598-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103182249460.9598-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>; from xod@sixgirls.org on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:54:45PM -0500
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:54:45PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 10:01:52PM -0500, SwiftRain wrote:
> > > John Cowan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > True. But when it changes, we deny that what we used to believe was,
> > > > in fact, knowledge.
> > >
> > > .i sruma le du'u ro jitfa selkrici ku na seldjuno kei ku zo'u
> > > no seldjuno cu zasti pe'i
> >
> > I'm sorry, that doesn't parse, and my understanding of the language is
> > not up to the task of deconstructing it. Can you re-state?
> 
> 
> e'u zo ru'a basti zo sruma

Still doesn't parse. It's zo'u that's the issue.

> > > .i ro selkrici cu jitfa .i se'o le prane nu jimpe cu na cumki .iare'e
> >
> 
> 
> .i ro selkrici cu jitfa no da

How can 'no da' be a standard of falsity?

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

