From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Mon Mar 19 11:00:30 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 19 Mar 2001 19:00:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 95627 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 19:00:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Mar 2001 19:00:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 19:00:25 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id OAA04836 for lojban@onelist.com; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:07:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:07:04 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Random lojban questions/annoyances.
Message-ID: <20010319140704.T3953@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@onelist.com
References: <20010318230736.A3953@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <E14euq5-0000r5-00@mercury.ccil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <E14euq5-0000r5-00@mercury.ccil.org>; from cowan@ccil.org on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 03:16:29AM -0500
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 03:16:29AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> 
> > Nothing! I think that is exactly right and true and acceptable. But
> > the freaking _definition_ of the lojban language says that stating
> > something that is not true as the x2 of djuno is incorrect use of the
> > language!
> 
> No, it says that statements that use a false statement as the x2 of
> djuno are *false*, not incorrect use of the language. Falsity of the
> inner bridi entails falsity of the outer bridi, not ungrammaticality
> of the outer bridi.

If that's the case, then I think the definition of djuno needs to be
changed to include _some_ mention of a truth requirement, because I, for
one, disagree with your use of both djuno and the English work 'know'.
And I don't think I'm going to argue with you about this anymore,
because I don't think there's any chance of us finding common ground.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

