From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Mon Mar 19 14:43:04 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 19 Mar 2001 22:43:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 89327 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 22:43:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Mar 2001 22:43:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO s1.uklinux.net) (212.1.130.11) by mta2 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 22:43:02 -0000 Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (root@ppp-1-231.cvx1.telinco.net [212.1.136.231]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2JMgwr28802 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:42:58 GMT Envelope-To: Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 14f8Lt-0000B1-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:42:13 +0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:42:13 +0000 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: jbofi'e bug? [Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc] Message-ID: <20010319224213.A679@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Reply-To: Richard Curnow Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <01031620132005.29570@neofelis> <20010317155229.W29369@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20010319214931.B363@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp In-Reply-To: <20010319214931.B363@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>; from rpc@myself.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 09:49:31PM +0000 Sender: Richard Curnow X-eGroups-From: Richard Curnow From: Richard Curnow On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 09:49:31PM +0000, Richard Curnow wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > I think I just found a jbofi'e bug: > > > > rlpowell@calum> jbofihe -x > > .e'u lu le cmavo be zo ui bei le'a li vo > > etc. > > Yes, the lack of a tag for cmavo3 is a bug; I shall investigate. > After checking I don't think it is. le'a is a BAI cmavo, so "le'a li vo" is not an ordinary sumti place. If the "le'a" is removed, you get a cmavo3 tag applied to "li vo", so the basic mechanism is OK for ordinary linked sumti. Something like "le'a li vo" doesn't qualify for a place; it's like saying that in gau mi le mlatu cu citka "gau mi" is citka1 and "le mlatu" is citka2, which is wrong. "gau mi" is in a separate modal place of citka, as is "le'a li vo" in the earlier example. So it's not a jbofi'e bug after all. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com Weston-super-Mare United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/