From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Mon Mar 19 14:55:18 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 19 Mar 2001 22:55:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 38257 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2001 22:55:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Mar 2001 22:55:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2001 22:55:13 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA10374 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:01:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:01:55 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: jbofi'e bug? [Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc] Message-ID: <20010319180155.A3953@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com References: <01031620132005.29570@neofelis> <20010317155229.W29369@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <20010319214931.B363@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> <20010319224213.A679@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010319224213.A679@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>; from richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:42:13PM +0000 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:42:13PM +0000, Richard Curnow wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 09:49:31PM +0000, Richard Curnow wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:52:30PM -0500, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > > > > I think I just found a jbofi'e bug: > > > > > > rlpowell@calum> jbofihe -x > > > .e'u lu le cmavo be zo ui bei le'a li vo > > > > etc. > > > > Yes, the lack of a tag for cmavo3 is a bug; I shall investigate. > > > > After checking I don't think it is. le'a is a BAI cmavo, so "le'a li > vo" is not an ordinary sumti place. If the "le'a" is removed, you get a > cmavo3 tag applied to "li vo", so the basic mechanism is OK for ordinary > linked sumti. Something like "le'a li vo" doesn't qualify for a place; > it's like saying that in > > gau mi le mlatu cu citka > > "gau mi" is citka1 and "le mlatu" is citka2, which is wrong. "gau mi" > is in a separate modal place of citka, as is "le'a li vo" in the earlier > example. So it's not a jbofi'e bug after all. You're right. My bad. -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP