From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Tue Mar 20 14:44:07 2001
Return-Path: <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 20 Mar 2001 22:44:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 18989 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2001 22:44:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Mar 2001 22:44:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO scrabble.freeuk.net) (212.126.144.6) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2001 23:45:07 -0000
Received: from du-010-0237.freeuk.com ([212.126.153.237] helo=rrbcurnow.freeuk.com) by scrabble.freeuk.net with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 14fUrB-0000mZ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:44:01 +0000
Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 14fUTQ-00006r-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:19:28 +0000
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:19:28 +0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Fu'ivla morphology [was Re: [lojban] Re: spoken Lojban]
Message-ID: <20010320221928.E250@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
Reply-To: Richard Curnow <rpc@myself.com>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <F312C7ABTDRbmA5kTMF0000378d@hotmail.com> <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103181908051.9333-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.30.0103181908051.9333-100000@shiva.sixgirls.org>; from xod@sixgirls.org on Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:21:37PM -0500
Sender: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-eGroups-From: Richard Curnow <rpc@myself.com>
From: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>

On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 07:21:37PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> e'u ro ko pilno la datnrueiv goi ko'a .enai la datnrxril,odio goi ko'e .i
> ma'a ka'e frili tinju'i ko'a .i ku'i le nu cpacu le tutci pe ko'e cu nandu
> .iki'ubo le skamrxuebsaita cu cfipu .ije le tutci pe ko'e baza morsi
> .ije le xamgu tutci pe ko'e cu kargu .ije ko'a zmadu ko'e le ka sance

skamrxuebsaita has to be something like skamrxuebzaita, because bs is
not a valid consonant pairing.

I'm not sure whether the comma in datnrxril,odio is valid. It seems
very reasonable in this case, as it's certainly where the syllable break
occurs. I hadn't considered before that commas could appear between
consonants and vowels like this - more jbofi'e tweaking is going to be
needed I fear...

Does anyone have a definitive ruling on whether the comma is valid in
this kind of case?

Cheers
Richard

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com
Weston-super-Mare
United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/


