From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Mar 20 17:54:12 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000
Received: (qmail 90475 invoked from network); 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.226) by mta3 with SMTP; 21 Mar 2001 02:55:16 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:54:11 -0800
Received: from 200.41.210.21 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.21]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [: Re: [lojban] Train catching ut nunc]
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F226cgx6jsdEmM3sw8A0000626b@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Mar 2001 01:54:11.0448 (UTC) FILETIME=[D307FF80:01C0B1A9]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la ritcrd cusku di'e

> > > > pu ki mi pu'o je banai snada tu'a le trene
>
>I think there's a ku
>missing here - maybe "pu ki ku mi" or "pu ku mi" was intended?

You're right, I completely missed it! If it had been
{pu mi} I would have detected it immediately, but I
guess I associated {pu ki} with {pu ku} and didn't
realize there was anything strange. Just goes to show
how far we are from fluency yet...

co'o mi'e xorxes



_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


