From pycyn@aol.com Wed Mar 21 16:21:31 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 22 Mar 2001 00:21:31 -0000
Received: (qmail 12399 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 00:21:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 22 Mar 2001 00:21:30 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m03.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.6) by mta3 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 01:22:35 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.5.) id r.3b.12160c54 (14381) for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:21:18 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3b.12160c54.27ea9f7d@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:21:17 EST
Subject: Re: [lojban] Objective Reality & krici (was: Random lojban questions/annoyanc...
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_3b.12160c54.27ea9f7d_boundary"
Content-Disposition: Inline
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10501
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_3b.12160c54.27ea9f7d_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It is important to notice that xod's claim/challenge is an empirical 
generalization, not -- as the connection with words has led us to think 
sometimes -- about definitions.
For every x and y there is a z such that if x believes y then z would count 
as evidence for y within x's epistemology and x believes z. Note especially 
the "within x's epistemology", which goes beyond belief toward truth and 
knowledge and away from what I (or any non-x) might believe.

--part1_3b.12160c54.27ea9f7d_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>It is important to notice that xod's claim/challenge is an empirical 
<BR>generalization, not -- as the connection with words has led us to think 
<BR>sometimes -- about definitions.
<BR>For every x and y there is a z such that if x believes y then z would count 
<BR>as evidence for y within x's epistemology and x believes z. &nbsp;Note especially 
<BR>the "within x's epistemology", which goes beyond belief toward truth and 
<BR>knowledge and away from what I (or any non-x) might believe.</FONT></HTML>

--part1_3b.12160c54.27ea9f7d_boundary--

