From rkthunga@humanmarkup.org Wed Mar 21 20:56:23 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rkthunga@humanmarkup.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 22 Mar 2001 04:56:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 45610 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2001 04:56:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 22 Mar 2001 04:56:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.nic-reg-dns.com) (208.49.24.2) by mta1 with SMTP; 22 Mar 2001 04:56:22 -0000 Received: from cc472501a [65.2.218.108] by mail3.nic-reg-dns.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A4F51B7F0040; Wed, 21 Mar 2001 20:52:05 -0800 Message-ID: <004001c0b28c$4848f3c0$6cda0241@cc472501a> Reply-To: "Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga" To: , Subject: Lojban personal experience Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 23:55:12 -0500 Organization: HumanMarkup.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003B_01C0B262.5E8186E0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 From: "Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga" ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C0B262.5E8186E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I wanted to ask the lojban group directly what type of experiences you have= had with communications through the use of your language. I would like to= know what your *personal* experience has been in the following: What aspects of miscommunication do not exist in lojban?=20 How much easier it is to understand the other person? What aspects of miscommunication still do exist? Of course, as I posted earlier on your group, I represent the HumanML initi= ative which is developing an XML framework for communicating internal human= characteristics. John Cowan has been providing very valuable terminology = and contributions for the HumanML endeavor based on the extensive research = already done by Lojban (our group is located at http://groups.yahoo.com/gro= up/humanmarkup if interested). Please do share your thoughts. Thanks, and take care, =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Regards, Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga rkthunga@humanmarkup.org =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C0B262.5E8186E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I wanted to ask the lojban group directly what type of experiences you= have=20 had with communications through the use of your language.  I would lik= e to=20 know what your *personal* experience has been in the following:
 
What aspects of miscommunication do not exist in lojban?
How much easier it is to understand the other person?
What aspects of miscommunication still do exist?
 
Of course, as I posted earlier on your group, I represent the HumanML= =20 initiative which is developing an XML framework for communicating internal = human=20 characteristics.  John Cowan has been providing very valuable=20 terminology and contributions for the HumanML endeavor based on the extensi= ve=20 research already done by Lojban (our group is located at http://groups.yahoo.com/= group/humanmarkup if=20 interested).
 
Please do share your thoughts.  Thanks, and take care,
 
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D
Regards,
Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga
rkthunga@humanmarkup.org
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D
------=_NextPart_000_003B_01C0B262.5E8186E0--