From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Mar 22 17:03:37 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@shiva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 23 Mar 2001 01:03:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 29882 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 01:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Mar 2001 01:03:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO shiva.sixgirls.org) (206.252.141.232) by mta1 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 01:03:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by shiva.sixgirls.org (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2N14kW09788 for ; Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:04:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:04:45 -0500 (EST) To: Subject: jei (was: krici In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Invent Yourself On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la xod cusku di'e > > >Usage two is the quality of the informational basis for a belief. > >(jezvelji'i?) > > Yuck! Not a third meaning for {jei} I hope! I suppose you don't > mean that to be a truth value (TRUE, FALSE, or something in > between). Isn't this what jei does? What's this about a 3rd meaning? And I suppose you don't mean it to be an indirect > question either. How could I use jei for that? And, I never use indirect questions. ----- "The trees are green, since green is good for the eyes". I agreed with him, and added, that God had created cattle, since beef soups strengthen man; that he created the donkey, so that it might give man something with which to compare himself; and he had created man, to eat beef soup and not be a donkey.