From graywyvern@hotmail.com Fri Mar 23 13:48:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: graywyvern@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 23 Mar 2001 21:48:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 41869 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2001 21:47:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 23 Mar 2001 21:47:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.236.129) by mta2 with SMTP; 23 Mar 2001 21:47:59 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 13:47:58 -0800 Received: from 65.67.96.113 by lw7fd.law7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:47:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.67.96.113] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Random lojban questions/annoyances. Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 21:47:58 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2001 21:47:58.0853 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED1E2350:01C0B3E2] From: "michael helsem" >From: Pycyn@aol.com li'o > > mi krici ledu'u na zasti fa le prane ja romoi ve skicu be > > le munje fatci > >Since you are answering questions today, why "universal fact" (an odd >concept >somehow) rather than "actual universe" {fatci munje}, presumably derived >from >{munje fi lei fatci}? i used MUNJE FATCI for our blurry English word "reality", i have used MUNJE before in several different technical senses but think to use it here as a base & not a modifier would introduce more trouble. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com