From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Sat Mar 24 14:20:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 24 Mar 2001 22:20:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 67056 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2001 22:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 24 Mar 2001 22:20:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta3 with SMTP; 24 Mar 2001 23:21:26 -0000 Received: from andrew ([62.252.12.84]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010324222019.OXWW285.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:20:19 +0000 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Random lojban questions/annoyances. Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 22:19:17 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010319131250.00c02230@127.0.0.1> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal From: "And Rosta" Lojbab: > The current definition is NOT a single word, and the whole must be used to > get the meaning. There MUST be an epistemology, which COULD be > belief. But I can "know" something by one epistemology and "know" the > exact opposite by a different epistemology, in Lojban. Could you explain what an epistemology is, and give a couple examples of how one can "know" something by one epistemology and "know" the exact opposite by a different epistemology? I didn't understand the example about two experimenters that you gave to Jorge. --And.