From b.gohla@gmx.de Sun Mar 25 23:53:07 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: b.gohla@gmx.de X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 26 Mar 2001 07:53:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 43853 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2001 07:53:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 26 Mar 2001 07:53:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (194.221.183.20) by mta1 with SMTP; 26 Mar 2001 07:53:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 5156 invoked by uid 0); 26 Mar 2001 07:53:05 -0000 Received: from sam.comnets.uni-bremen.de (HELO gmx.de) (134.102.186.10) by mail.gmx.net (mail08) with SMTP; 26 Mar 2001 07:53:05 -0000 Sender: bgo Message-ID: <3ABEF55D.51940CB1@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:53:01 +0200 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: re: project management Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bjoern Gohla --- In lojban@y..., Jay Kominek wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote: > The motivating? Or the dating? The motivating is just an observation I've > made. Pages which have things change on them get visited a lot, even if > there aren't changes for awhile. As far as the dating, I just find it > difficult to figure out which documents are the right versions of things. > (In how many places is the gismu list linked to?) > > > >and get rid of copies of things > > >which are out of date so people aren't worried they're downloading a > > >worthless copy of the gismu list or something.) > > > > That which is out of date is marked as such, usually by putting it in the > > "historical" section. If something has a date that is 10 years old, that > > is because it hasn't changed in 10 years. > > Well, there are for instance, a couple of lujvo files floating around, I > think. NORALUJ.TXT? and just lujvo and something else. Which one is the > one people are supposed to get? All? Do they duplicate each other? I don't > really see any dates on them so I don't know which one is the most recent. this problem could be alleviated by the cvs repository i proposed, on the one hand it would help those working on files keep track of who did what and when, and on the other hand it would allow interested outsiders to retrieve any version of the work including the most up to date. the easiest thing would be to automatically generate a headline on the frontpage of the website whenever the repository is updated co'o mi'e .biorn