From lojbab@lojban.org Tue Mar 27 12:22:34 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 27 Mar 2001 20:22:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 77602 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 20:22:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2001 20:22:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-3.cais.net) (205.252.14.73) by mta3 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2001 21:23:37 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (155.dynamic.cais.com [207.226.56.155]) by stmpy-3.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2RKMVa62068 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:22:31 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010327152429.00b89d50@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:26:02 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Fwd: a consideration
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

People said that they might like to respond to new queries. I am 
forwarding this one to the list, since I don't have time to respond to it 
this week, since I'm trying to get backordered books out.

>From: "mr. mystery" <mystery28man@hotmail.com>
>Subject: a consideration
>Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:35:52 -0000
>
>brilliant! simply brilliant! Have the concepts of E prime been imbedded 
>into lojban?
>
>My strong concern is this: I understand that when computers 'think' using 
>memetics the most reasonable language to think in will be lojban. Humans 
>will with to communicate (program) with their computers so learning lojban 
>as a programming language may help promote it worldwide. The concept of 
>the name is pretty arbitrary however (lojban = logical language). I 
>believe strongly that the ENTIRE NAME should have a more internationally 
>marketable concept ... imagine every country learning lojban as both a 
>second language to their own as well as learning lojban to 
>program/communicate better with memetically thinking machines. Good 
>reasons but ... the NAME! If a logical langauge were created for the 
>world it should connotate this far reaching concept.
>
>I believe the language should be WORLD+LANGUAGE (in its lojban translation 
>of course). Of COURSE it is LOGICAL but the PURPOSE is for the WORLD to 
>know it - to bring the world together and to do so through the use of 
>computers as a means to communicate with ALL MEDIA. Other concepts may 
>include EARTH, HUMANITY and ALL.
>
>Again, BRILLIANT WORK and potentially WORLD CHANGING. I commend you.
>
>Erik von Markovik
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


