From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Tue Mar 27 15:35:49 2001
Return-Path: <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 27 Mar 2001 23:35:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 87206 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 23:35:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2001 23:35:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta2 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2001 23:35:48 -0000
Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA05893 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:42:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:42:47 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] jbofi'e version 0.36 released
Message-ID: <20010327184247.B11825@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <20010327223944.B334@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> <20010327165422.J11825@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <m14i2xB-000BC6C@megalith.rattlesnake.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <m14i2xB-000BC6C@megalith.rattlesnake.com>; from root@megalith.rattlesnake.com on Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 06:32:45PM -0500
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>

On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 06:32:45PM -0500, Robert J. Chassell wrote:
> > - Switch to GNU General Public License
> > license)
> 
> GAAAAAKKKK!
> 
> Ummm, are you _sure_ that you want to make it impossible for people to
> make commercial software based on jbofi'e?
> 
> Robin, what do you mean? 
> 
> The GPL *guarantees* that *anyone* can make commercial software based
> on jbofi'e. With the GPL, you can sell software, you can give it
> away, you can change it, you can do what you like; but you may not
> take aways others rights. You are forbidden to forbid.

But you also have to distribute the source, which most companies
_will_not_do_. The effect is the same.

> It is a different kind of license, what the games theory people call a
> `sucker license', such as the BSD license, that makes it possible for
> one company to take Richard's work and prevent him and you and anyone
> else from using a derivation of Richard's work, even if you are the
> person making the changes and your changes are somewhat different from
> theirs and independently. Remember, the GPL guarantees your and
> others freedom. It does not let anyone else take it away, whether
> from the author or from anyone else. The BSD license does permit
> that: taking even from the author. (That was the intent, since the US
> military, the funding agency for BSD, was trying to subsidize US
> companies. The authors were paid for `work for hire'.)

Ummmm, that doesn't really bother me.


-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP

