From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Mar 27 15:43:18 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 27 Mar 2001 23:43:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 15694 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2001 23:43:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 27 Mar 2001 23:43:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 27 Mar 2001 23:43:16 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22641; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:45:46 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3AC12625.2090500@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:45:41 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010215
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bob@RATTLESNAKE.COM
Cc: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca, lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] jbofi'e version 0.36 released
References: <20010327223944.B334@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com> <20010327165422.J11825@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <m14i2xB-000BC6C@megalith.rattlesnake.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

Robert J. Chassell wrote:

> It is a different kind of license, what the games theory people call a
> `sucker license', such as the BSD license, that makes it possible for
> one company

hereinafter Badco

> to take Richard's work and prevent him and you and anyone
> else from using a derivation of Richard's work,

>From using a *specific* derivative of it, namely the one Badco wrote;
not from using *any* derivative of it. You can always do what
Stallman did with LMLisp: duplicate the changes yourself.

> even if you are the
> person making the changes and your changes are somewhat different from
> theirs and independently.

If your changes are different from theirs and made independently, then
your work cannot be a derivative work of Badco's.

> The BSD license does permit
> that: taking even from the author.

It does not permit taking the author's work from the author.

> And remember, if you ever get into this deeper, `derived work' is a
> legal term -- it means what courts say it means...

Indeed. No public license has yet had to face a court test.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein


