From rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca Wed Mar 28 08:48:04 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: rlpowell@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 28 Mar 2001 16:48:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 31970 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2001 16:47:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2001 16:47:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca) (129.97.134.11) by mta3 with SMTP; 28 Mar 2001 17:48:07 -0000 Received: (from rlpowell@localhost) by calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id LAA22728 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:54:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:54:04 -0500 To: lojban Subject: Aussies [Re: djuno: the key issue (was: Re: Fwd: Re: [lojban] Random lojban questions/...] Message-ID: <20010328115403.Q11825@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> Mail-Followup-To: lojban References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from arosta@uclan.ac.uk on Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:35:28PM +0100 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:35:28PM +0100, And Rosta wrote: > John: > #> But I think (I) is closer to established usage and also to the views of the Three > #> Magi (pc, John & Jorge). > # > #No, I hold (II) as well. > > So you deny that "crucially, the known must be true in the epistemology"? > It is enough that the x1 claim that the known is true? So if on the basis > of our common epistemology you believed that Sydney was the capital > of Australia, I could say "John djuno that Sydney is the cap. of A, fo > our mutual epistemology"? Umm, isn't it? -Robin -- http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ BTW, I'm male, honest. Information wants to be free. Too bad most of it is crap. --RLP