From jcowan@reutershealth.com Wed Mar 28 09:38:57 2001
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 28 Mar 2001 17:38:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 61894 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2001 17:38:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2001 17:38:21 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.reutershealth.com) (204.243.9.36) by mta1 with SMTP; 28 Mar 2001 17:38:21 -0000
Received: from reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[192.168.3.11]) by mail.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28346; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:40:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3AC2221D.3@reutershealth.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:40:45 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010215
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: And Rosta <arosta@uclan.ac.uk>
Cc: pycyn <pycyn@aol.com>, lojban <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: djuno: the key issue (was: Re: Fwd: Re: [lojban] Random lojban questions/...
References: <sac220f3.040@gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

And scripsit:

> #No, I hold (II) as well.
> 
> So you deny that "crucially, the known must be true in the epistemology"?

Hmm, now I think I would rather hold (I). Arrgh.

The trouble with argument is that it destroys our comforting certitudes.

> It is enough that the x1 claim that the known is true? So if on the basis 
> of our common epistemology you believed that Sydney was the capital
> of Australia, I could say "John djuno that Sydney is the cap. of A, fo
> our mutual epistemology"?

No, I can't swallow that.

How about this intermediate position: x1 must believe that x2 follows
from x4. After all, from an inconsistent theory of any sort, every
proposition whatever follows. But we don't want to say of people
with inconsistent theories (most of us, belike) that they know
everything, or even think they know everything.

-- 
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein


