From bob@RATTLESNAKE.COM Wed Mar 28 13:20:10 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: bob@rattlesnake.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_0_4); 28 Mar 2001 21:20:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 15500 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2001 21:18:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 28 Mar 2001 21:18:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO megalith.rattlesnake.com) (140.186.114.245) by mta2 with SMTP; 28 Mar 2001 21:18:50 -0000 Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.111) for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:18:50 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:18:50 -0500 (EST) To: b.gohla@gmx.de Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-reply-to: <01032521222504.00708@linux> (message from =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gohla?= on Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:22:25 +0200) Subject: Re: [lojban] Document Management (was: Marketing lojban) Reply-to: bob@rattlesnake.com References: <99l2m8+4r97@eGroups.com> <01032521222504.00708@linux> X-eGroups-From: "Robert J. Chassell" From: "Robert J. Chassell" one thing that struck me scanning through documentation is that texinfo seems to not be able to include images. Actually, you can include images in Texinfo. The problem is that you should include alternatives for people using character-only or speech-only interfaces. ... while texinfo looks like the more easily useable tool, docbook appears to be more feature rich. This is a disadvantage since people tend to use the features that fit their prefered output -- such as high resolution hardcopy printing. ... what about pdf hyperlinks... I don't know about pdf hyperlinks. My experience with PDF is that it is an awkward and inefficient format and I try to avoid it. Other Texinfo output formats provide for hyperlinks. -- Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com