From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Mar 30 16:46:17 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_0_1); 31 Mar 2001 00:46:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 66059 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.95) by mta2 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:36:45 -0800 Received: from 200.41.247.41 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.247.41] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] jbofi'e bug or I just don't get it. Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Mar 2001 00:36:45.0466 (UTC) FILETIME=[A9F0E7A0:01C0B97A] From: "Jorge Llambias" la camgusmis cusku di'e >Why does > >.oi mi cafne na morji le du'u mi kanke pilno le cmavo be zo poi > >not parse Because {na} can only be used in front of the whole selbri of the bridi that it negates, not in the middle of a selbri. You can say {mi so'iroi na morji}. >but > >.oi mi cafne nalmorji le du'u mi kanke pilno le cmavo be zo poi >does? No {na} in this case. >And why does > >le nu mi pinxe xy. ba na lakne > >not pars It doesn't? I would have said it did. Is it another case of LALR1itis? co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.