From pycyn@aol.com Sun Apr 01 15:18:28 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_0_1); 1 Apr 2001 22:18:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 5423 invoked from network); 1 Apr 2001 22:18:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 1 Apr 2001 22:18:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m05.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.8) by mta1 with SMTP; 1 Apr 2001 22:18:26 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.14.) id r.5f.131ada67 (4408) for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5f.131ada67.27f90317@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:17:59 EDT
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Random lojban questions/annoyances (nu subthread)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_5f.131ada67.27f90317_boundary"
Content-Disposition: Inline
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_5f.131ada67.27f90317_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Amazingly, all the various species NU, maybe with the exception of {su'u}, 
had rather precise definitions when they were being created . Much of that 
has fallen into disuetude over the years (sometimes days) of sage, however, 
to the point that someone recently got indignant with me for pointing out 
that what he had marked as a process was pretty certainly an activity instead 
(or maybe it was the other way round). At some point, however, the 
differences between events, properties and propositions do make a real 
difference -- though maybe not in some of the more common places available 
for sumti at the root of which they lie.
Do we really want a boring technical discussion on this one just now? 

--part1_5f.131ada67.27f90317_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>Amazingly, all the various species NU, maybe with the exception of {su'u}, 
<BR>had rather precise definitions when they were being created . &nbsp;Much of that 
<BR>has fallen into disuetude over the years (sometimes days) of sage, however, 
<BR>to the point that someone recently got indignant with me for pointing out 
<BR>that what he had marked as a process was pretty certainly an activity instead 
<BR>(or maybe it was the other way round). &nbsp;At some point, however, the 
<BR>differences between events, properties and propositions do make a real 
<BR>difference -- though maybe not in some of the more common places available 
<BR>for sumti at the root of which they lie.
<BR>Do we really want a boring technical discussion on this one just now? </FONT></HTML>

--part1_5f.131ada67.27f90317_boundary--

