From pycyn@aol.com Mon Apr 02 08:53:50 2001
Return-Path: <Pycyn@aol.com>
X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_0_1); 2 Apr 2001 15:53:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 39792 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2001 15:53:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 2 Apr 2001 15:53:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imo-r16.mx.aol.com) (152.163.225.70) by mta3 with SMTP; 2 Apr 2001 16:54:52 -0000
Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-r16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.14.) id r.d6.480996b (9666) for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:53:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <d6.480996b.27f9fa79@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:53:29 EDT
Subject: RE: NU
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_d6.480996b.27f9fa79_boundary"
Content-Disposition: Inline
X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519
From: pycyn@aol.com

--part1_d6.480996b.27f9fa79_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Short semi-technical lecture anyhow.
In the langauges I know, processes tend to fade into activities by 
generalization (writes a book/writes books) and into achievements at the 
initiative and completive aspects (initiative more likely with activities, 
actually). Lojban adds the possibility of bringing the state in, since it 
does not distinguish lexically between "is writing" and "is a writer." So,
pu le nu mi ciska "Before I write"
is ambiguous among at least the following, some of which probably make a 
difference:
pu le mu'e mi ciska "before I wrote" (which itself is ambiguous between 
"first wrote" and "finished writing [it]")
pu le pu'u mi ciska "before I was writing [it]"
pu le zu'o mi ciska "before I was writing"
pu le za'i mi ciska "before I was a writer"
The distinction could probably be made in other ways with just {nu} but the 
additions would then become obligatory for that meaning.

le ka le skani cu blanu is a property of space time areas, at least.


--part1_d6.480996b.27f9fa79_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><FONT SIZE=2>Short semi-technical lecture anyhow.
<BR>In the langauges I know, processes tend to fade into activities by 
<BR>generalization (writes a book/writes books) and into achievements at the 
<BR>initiative and completive aspects (initiative more likely with activities, 
<BR>actually). &nbsp;Lojban adds the possibility of bringing the state in, since it 
<BR>does not distinguish lexically between "is writing" and "is a writer." &nbsp;So,
<BR>pu le nu mi ciska "Before I write"
<BR>is ambiguous among at least the following, some of which probably make a 
<BR>difference:
<BR>pu le mu'e mi ciska "before I wrote" (which itself is ambiguous between 
<BR>"first wrote" and "finished writing [it]")
<BR>pu le pu'u mi ciska "before I was writing [it]"
<BR>pu le zu'o mi ciska "before I was writing"
<BR>pu le za'i mi ciska "before I was a writer"
<BR>The distinction could probably be made in other ways with just {nu} but the 
<BR>additions would then become obligatory for that meaning.
<BR>
<BR>le ka le skani cu blanu is a property of space time areas, at least.
<BR></FONT></HTML>

--part1_d6.480996b.27f9fa79_boundary--

