From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Apr 03 17:01:25 2001
Return-Path: <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 4 Apr 2001 00:01:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 62997 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 4 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.164) by mta3 with SMTP; 4 Apr 2001 01:01:04 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:54:55 -0700
Received: from 200.41.210.4 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Tue, 03 Apr 2001 23:54:54 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.4]
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Random lojban questions/annoyances.
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 23:54:54 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F164gC81TbdkSmLAztx00000002@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Apr 2001 23:54:55.0128 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B50B980:01C0BC99]
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>


la Avital cusku di'e

>There is all the difference between
>
>1. mi nelci lenu mi klama
>2. mi nelci ledu'u mi klama
>3. mi nelci leka mi klama
>4. mi nelci leni mi klama
>
>and others. (The first two are a bit similar, but the third and fourth
>are different than them all).

The case of {ni} is special because it contains a hidden indirect
question, but let's consider the other three:

>1. I like walking
>2. I like the fact that I am walking

In English, the difference between these two is that the first
refers to events of walking in general while the second refers
to a particular event that is happening now, so the second
would best be translated as {mi nelci le nu mi ca ca'a cadzu}.
({klama} is not necessarily walking.) Liking a du'u, in the sense
that objects or events are liked, is a strange notion as
far as I can tell. "The fact that" here is just an English
idiom to indicate that the event actually happens, it should
not be translated as {du'u}.

>3. I like my walkingness

{le ka mi klama} is not "my walkingness" nor "my goingness".
It is the property of being gone to by me, {le ka mi klama ce'u}.
A property ka always has an open slot, for the things of which
it is a property.

{le ka ce'u klama} is the property of being a goer,
{le ka klama ce'u} the property of being gone to,
{le ka klama fi ce'u} the property of being the origin
of a going, and so on. Liking these things is again
not something that people usually do. You may like
goers, or you may like being a goer yourself, (le nu do klama)
but what does it mean to like the property which all goers
share?

co'o mi'e xorxes


_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.


