From richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com Wed Apr 11 14:26:47 2001
Return-Path: <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-Sender: richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 11 Apr 2001 21:26:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 63353 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2001 21:26:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 11 Apr 2001 21:26:44 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO s1.uklinux.net) (212.1.130.11) by mta1 with SMTP; 11 Apr 2001 21:26:43 -0000
Received: from rrbcurnow.freeuk.com (root@ppp-1-138.cvx5.telinco.net [212.1.152.138]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3BLQdf05307 for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:26:39 +0100
Envelope-To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Received: from richard by rrbcurnow.freeuk.com with local (Exim 2.02 #2) id 14nS3R-000062-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:21:33 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:21:33 +0100
To: Lojban List <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] A set of questions
Message-ID: <20010411222133.B109@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
Reply-To: Richard Curnow <rpc@myself.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Lojban List <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
References: <Pine.BSO.4.21.0104101502160.22842-100000@thorin> <4.3.2.7.2.20010411141032.00b74560@127.0.0.1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i-nntp
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010411141032.00b74560@127.0.0.1>; from lojbab@lojban.org on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:00:45PM -0400
Sender: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>
X-eGroups-From: Richard Curnow <rpc@myself.com>
From: Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 03:00:45PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> 
> >5) How are stage 4 fu'ivla really created?
> 
> So far, almost no one has done so. There is no easy way, which is why 
> almost no one has done so.

There are a few templates that seem guaranteed to be safely stage 4 fu'ivla,
such as CVCCVCV when the 'CC' is not a valid initial pair. As Bob says,
this area is full of nasty surprises. 

> 
> >9) vu'o connects the entire previous (group of) sumti. How can you connect
> >only 'part' of it, such as the last two out of three?
> 
> I'm not sure vu'o has ever been used, and would have to look up to see what 
> it means.
> 

I know this is rather contrived :

le bersa e ke le nanmu e le ninmu ke'e vu'o noi speni remei cu zvati

"the son, the man and the woman (the latter 2 being a married couple)
are all here."



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Curnow rpc@myself.com
Weston-super-Mare
United Kingdom http://go.to/richard.curnow/


