From Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de Thu Apr 12 11:09:43 2001
Return-Path: <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>
X-Sender: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_1); 12 Apr 2001 18:09:43 -0000
Received: (qmail 76562 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 18:09:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mw.egroups.com) (10.1.2.2) by mta1 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:41 -0000
X-eGroups-Return: Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de
Received: from [10.1.4.69] by mw.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Apr 2001 18:09:40 -0000
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 18:09:40 -0000
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: FA tagging
Message-ID: <9b4r14+crv4@eGroups.com>
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Length: 518
X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster
X-Originating-IP: 193.149.49.79
From: "A.W.T." <Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de>

I recently became aware of something IMO not explicitely described in the Book:
Is it allowed to say {mi dunda do fe levi rozgu} and what does it mean? Is it equivalent to {mi dunda levi rozgu do}?
In other words: can a selbri place already occupied by a sumti *by word order* be dis-placed by a *following* tagged sumti? (I'd 
tend for this!) Or, could this mean that this tagging causes the place being occupied by two (or more) sumti (like in {fa mi fa do 
klama fe le zarci fe le zdani etc.})?

co'o mi'e .aulun.