From pycyn@aol.com Thu Apr 12 14:04:22 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: Pycyn@aol.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 12 Apr 2001 21:04:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 8462 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2001 21:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 12 Apr 2001 21:04:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imo-m05.mx.aol.com) (64.12.136.8) by mta3 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2001 22:05:25 -0000 Received: from Pycyn@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.14.) id r.e8.1346cd6f (4469) for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:04:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:04:14 EDT Subject: Re: [lojban] FA tagging To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_e8.1346cd6f.2807724e_boundary" Content-Disposition: Inline X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10519 From: pycyn@aol.com --part1_e8.1346cd6f.2807724e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/12/2001 3:10:17 PM Central Daylight Time, Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de writes: > I recently became aware of something IMO not explicitely described in the > Book: > Is it allowed to say {mi dunda do fe levi rozgu} and what does it mean? Is > it equivalent to {mi dunda levi rozgu do}? > In other words: can a selbri place already occupied by a sumti *by word > order* be dis-placed by a *following* tagged sumti? (I'd > tend for this!) Or, could this mean that this tagging causes the place > being occupied by two (or more) sumti (like in {fa mi fa do > klama fe le zarci fe le zdani etc.})? > The latter (alas), as though they were conjoined"{mi e do klama le zarci e le zdani) Book 9.3 (example 3.9, just to confuse matters more). --part1_e8.1346cd6f.2807724e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/12/2001 3:10:17 PM Central Daylight Time,
Ti@fa-kuan.muc.de writes:


I recently became aware of something IMO not explicitely described in the
Book:
Is it allowed to say {mi dunda do fe levi rozgu} and what does it mean? Is
it equivalent to {mi dunda levi rozgu do}?
In other words: can a selbri place already occupied by a sumti *by word
order* be dis-placed by a *following* tagged sumti? (I'd
tend for this!) Or, could this mean that this tagging causes the place
being occupied by two (or more) sumti (like in {fa mi fa do
klama fe le zarci fe le zdani etc.})?

The latter (alas), as though they were conjoined"{mi e do klama le zarci e le
zdani)
Book 9.3 (example 3.9, just to confuse matters more). --part1_e8.1346cd6f.2807724e_boundary--