Subject: Re: lu/li'u

From: [email-masked]
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:39:10 EDT

In a message dated 4/16/2001 10:59:09 AM Central Daylight Time, 
[email-masked] writes:

Because a quotation begins and ends and there is not any other obvious 
gramamtical mark when these events occur -- or need not be.

<I obviously meant lu/lo'u.>    
Well, not obviously, but certainly more understandably.  The parser will 
reject a {lu} quotation if it is not grammatical, but allows an ungrammatical 
{lo'u} to pass. the difference allows one to discuss dubious or known-bad 
Lojban without being ungrammatical oneself.