From jjllambias@hotmail.com Mon Apr 16 16:39:00 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@onelist.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 16 Apr 2001 23:38:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 51882 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2001 23:38:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 16 Apr 2001 23:38:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.229) by mta2 with SMTP; 16 Apr 2001 23:38:59 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:38:58 -0700 Received: from 200.41.210.27 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:38:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.41.210.27] To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [lojban] Q Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:38:58 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2001 23:38:58.0917 (UTC) FILETIME=[68BD4150:01C0C6CE] From: "Jorge Llambias" la and cusku di'e >IIRC Jorge was questioning the utility of the subtypes >of {nu} (and I would disagree with him on that point). Yes, that was my original stand. Then I also agreed with Adam that the distinction we are forced to make between nu/ka/du'u is redundant, in this case because the place that is being filled by these in general by itself determines which one should be used. co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.