Subject: RE: [lojban] Q

From: "Jorge Llambias" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:38:58

la and cusku di'e

>IIRC Jorge was questioning the utility of the subtypes
>of {nu} (and I would disagree with him on that point).

Yes, that was my original stand. Then I also agreed with
Adam that the distinction we are forced to make between
nu/ka/du'u is redundant, in this case because the
place that is being filled by these in general by itself
determines which one should be used.

co'o mi'e xorxes

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.