From david@shockey.com Wed Apr 18 12:25:57 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: david@shockey.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 18 Apr 2001 19:25:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 61374 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2001 19:25:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2001 19:25:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO c000.snv.cp.net) (209.228.32.78) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2001 19:25:54 -0000 Received: (cpmta 22345 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2001 12:25:53 -0700 Date: 18 Apr 2001 12:25:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20010418192553.22344.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net> X-Sent: 18 Apr 2001 19:25:53 GMT Received: from [209.215.96.235] by mail.shockey.com with HTTP; 18 Apr 2001 12:25:53 PDT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Mime-Version: 1.0 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: Web Mail 3.7.1.9 Subject: Re: [lojban] Events From: david@shockey.com This is well outside of my areas of expertise, but, it would seem to me that time would have no meaning without events. On Wed, 18 April 2001, pycyn@aol.com wrote: > > In a message dated 4/18/2001 12:48:04 PM Central Daylight Time, >
xod@sixgirls.org writes: >
>
>
>

Is it a concidence that the most basic event abstractor (NU) is refers to >
'events', and 'events' are the points of space-time? >

>
>
>
>
It is not a coincidence that the basic event abstractor refers to events, and >
that the word "event" is used in describing it. The second part is also not >
a coincidence, because the correlation does not occur: events are not the >
points of space-time. At best, events are what happen at such points, by >
which we pick out some as interesting. >
> > > > > > > > > > > >

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

> > > > >
> > To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com >
> >
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. >
> > _____________________________________________________ Get your name as your email and web site address. http://www.NetIdentity.com. Be somebody online.