Subject: RE: [lojban] Three more issues

From: "And Rosta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:00:56 +0100

John to Avital:
> > I mean, <nu prenu kei> is lo valsi, isn't it?
> 
> No.

I think this is an unresolved issue, whether or
not we simplify the claim to "<nu prenu kei> cu valsi"
(or, equivalently, "The Beatles cu prenu"). The 
unresolved issue is whether pa valsi is a single
word (in which case the claim is false) or a single 
amount of wordage (in which case the claim is true). 
I guess usage favours the former.

--And.