From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Wed Apr 18 14:01:52 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 18 Apr 2001 21:01:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 72320 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2001 21:01:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by m8.onelist.org with QMQP; 18 Apr 2001 21:01:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.46) by mta3 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2001 21:01:51 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.252.13.250]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010418210150.EVMH285.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:01:50 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Three more issues
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 22:00:56 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEFJDPAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
In-Reply-To: <3ADB1FD7.4090900@reutershealth.com>
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

John to Avital:
> > I mean, <nu prenu kei> is lo valsi, isn't it?
> 
> No.

I think this is an unresolved issue, whether or
not we simplify the claim to "<nu prenu kei> cu valsi"
(or, equivalently, "The Beatles cu prenu"). The 
unresolved issue is whether pa valsi is a single
word (in which case the claim is false) or a single 
amount of wordage (in which case the claim is true). 
I guess usage favours the former.

--And.