From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Apr 18 14:03:46 2001
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 18 Apr 2001 21:03:45 -0000
Received: (qmail 75222 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2001 21:03:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by l10.egroups.com with QMQP; 18 Apr 2001 21:03:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO stmpy-1.cais.net) (205.252.14.71) by mta2 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2001 21:03:42 -0000
Received: from bob.lojban.org (dynamic116.cl7.cais.net [205.177.20.116]) by stmpy-1.cais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3IL3a515907; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:03:36 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010418165408.00c2f100@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: vir1036/pop.cais.com@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 17:07:09 -0400
To: Value Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>, <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Events
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0104181614520.10480-100000@shiva.sixgirls.or g>
References: <20010418192553.22344.cpmta@c000.snv.cp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>

At 04:17 PM 04/18/2001 -0400, Value Yourself wrote:
>On 18 Apr 2001 david@shockey.com wrote:
>
> > This is well outside of my areas of expertise, but, it would seem to me 
> that time would have no meaning without events.
>
>
>Empty points of spacetime are called "events", whether or not anything
>important occurs there.
>
>If anyone disputes this use of the word "event", they can go to
><http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-holearg/>
>
>I understand the difference between this and the nu abstractor. My
>question remains; was there a connection in the minds of those who decided
>to use the english word "event"?

As the other mind in question (other than pc), I have to say that 
relativity theory was the last thing on my mind at the time, though in 
later discussions of tense, I believe I was one the people who brought in 
the spacetime analogy for spatial tenses.

My use of the term "event" for "nu" came from pc's description of 
Aristotelian event analysis.

I suspect that JCB's earlier analysis was similarly based on ancient 
logical-philosophical traditions, though pc could probably better tell you 
which ones. He often used the phrasing "event, state, or condition".

lojbab
--
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org


