From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Thu Apr 19 12:33:58 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 19 Apr 2001 19:33:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 68868 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2001 19:33:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l9.egroups.com with QMQP; 19 Apr 2001 19:33:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta01-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.41) by mta3 with SMTP; 19 Apr 2001 19:33:57 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.252.12.161]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010419193355.STLY283.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:33:55 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] RE:not only
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:33:04 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMIEKCDPAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <d6.533e86a.280e2542@aol.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

pycyn:
> Someplace back in the archives, whether for the net or various face-to-faces,
> is the history of {po'o} as a crutch. First semester logic students have
> bucked at "Only Ss are Ps" as "All Ps are Ss" since at least the third
> century bce (a textbook by Theophrastus assumes the student has this problem)
> and fans of "the logical language" have been no more tractable. So, to save
> them from having to think about what they were committed to (while still
> keeping that commitment tucked away in the deep semantics) we gave them
> {po'o} with the grammar of UI, so that they wouldn't even have toi struggle
> with the differences among the various places "only" (solus, monos,...)
> turned up, but could keep their SAE habits intact (aulun: what does Chinese
> do for these cases?).

That's very much how I remember the birth of po'o, too.

> This goes back to Loglan and attempts to correct it in
> the shift to Lojban failed (along with attempts to keep a few clever things
> from Loglan, alas). Pfui!

Which few clever things were lost?

--And.


