From xod@sixgirls.org Thu Apr 19 22:01:43 2001 Return-Path: X-Sender: xod@shiva.sixgirls.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 20 Apr 2001 05:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 55766 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 05:01:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Apr 2001 05:01:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO shiva.sixgirls.org) (63.219.55.100) by mta1 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 05:01:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by shiva.sixgirls.org (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3K51eX15574 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:01:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 01:01:40 -0400 (EDT) To: Subject: Re: [lojban] RE: not only In-Reply-To: <55.1456ecdb.2810a65a@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Value Yourself On Thu, 19 Apr 2001 pycyn@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 4/19/2001 12:11:01 PM Central Daylight Time, > rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > > > > However, I would certainly add something clarifying such entailment to a > > About as good a statement of how an implicature (not an implcation, by the > way) How about a definition of the differences between "implicature", "implication", and "entail"? The jargon is getting impossibly thick here. ------ 1.Why are you measuring the measure? The measure is the same. Even after Great One, the bones will be broken. I am telling you. Relic should believe me. 2.Where after religion you believe in religion and wish that to Ora. Emptiness is that what Baby God's Eye is fighting for.