From a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com Fri Apr 20 09:28:46 2001
Return-Path: <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
X-Sender: a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_2); 20 Apr 2001 16:28:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 70439 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2001 16:28:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.142) by l7.egroups.com with QMQP; 20 Apr 2001 16:28:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mta03-svc.ntlworld.com) (62.253.162.43) by mta3 with SMTP; 20 Apr 2001 16:28:45 -0000
Received: from andrew ([62.252.12.248]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010420154825.NVLA283.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@andrew> for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:48:25 +0100
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] RE:not only
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:47:31 +0100
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMAEMEDPAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <F18495EFk2H3b98Ktdh0000779c@hotmail.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Jorge:
> la and cusku di'e
> 
> >So here's my suggestion:
> >
> > lo'i nelci be le va stizu cu me le'i mlatu
> >
> >or
> >
> > lo'i nelci be le va stizu du le'i mlatu
> 
> (It should be {cu du}.)

What, stizu du parses as a tanru?

> I agree that that is the meaning, 

expressed very elegantly!

> but pc would have "is a subset of" instead of {du}:
> 
> lo'i nelci be le va stizu cu klesi le'i mlatu

Really? Can you recapitulate the arguments for this?

--And.